1A. I feel Michael is conflicted of his own opinion and
feelings about capital punishment. The indicators that Michael doesn’t believe
what he reasoned out were his feelings of anger and that he was proved wrong
with facts that capital punishment doesn’t deter murder or other violent
crimes.
I think emotions and beliefs, and moral values are the
barriers of thinking critically in his case.
1B. Maria is also conflicted and not sure where she stands
on the issue. Again, some indicators are
feeling angry and being proved wrong as she delve deeper into the argument.
Once again, emotions,
her belief system and moral values are barrier to thinking critically.
1C. I think Pete is like most human beings, we don’t
practice what we preach. I think most of us want to be “politically” correct and
are followers. But in private, most of the things we say and do to the outside
world are the complete opposite of what we really feel.
1D. I think this reasoning
is mostly Culturally based. In the Western Culture dogs and cats are pets therefore it is
unethical to eat them. But in some cultures, they are delicacies and are considered
like cows and chickens.
Once again, our beliefs and moral values come into play as
barriers to thinking critically.
2. The last step is difficult because after gathering,
dissecting and analyzing the facts it is hard to admit that what one strongly believe to be right and fair is
actually wrong and unreasonable.
Once again, one’s own emotions and belief system has been
questioned.
No comments:
Post a Comment